Nordic Military Leaders Demand Proven Weapons from Suppliers

In a significant shift in military procurement strategy, Nordic army leaders are insisting that suppliers demonstrate the effectiveness of their weapon systems through real-world application, specifically referencing the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Maj. Gen. Peter Harling Boysen, chief of the Royal Danish Army, emphasized at a recent panel discussion hosted by the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) in Belfast, that he will only consider purchasing equipment that has proven its operational capability in Ukraine.

Boysen routinely queries suppliers about whether their products have been utilized in the Ukraine war, asserting that such validation is critical in today’s evolving military landscape. “For new supply chains and new technologies, I’m never going to buy anything that hasn’t worked in Ukraine,” he stated, underscoring the demand for accountability and proven performance in military acquisitions.

Joining Boysen, Lt. Gen. Pasi Välimäki, Commander of the Finnish Army, echoed this sentiment, noting that equipment showcased at AUSA must demonstrate its effectiveness in real combat situations. He remarked, “The products that we have seen here at AUSA include a demonstrator, that’s nice, but systems operating in Ukraine are much easier for industry to demonstrate their actual product works.”

The urgency for proven technologies is heightened by the swift procurement cycles that military leaders face. Välimäki highlighted a two-year “window of opportunity” for finalizing new equipment contracts, which necessitates platforms that are mature and have demonstrated efficacy in the field. “You’re either in or you’re out,” he stated, indicating the high stakes involved in choosing the right systems.

Latvia’s state secretary, Aivars Purinš, also contributed to the discussion, urging manufacturers to test their technologies close to a “deployed situation.” He lamented past instances where advanced technologies failed in Ukraine, stating, “We have had too many stories… where the best technology solutions were deployed and suddenly they didn’t work as they were supposed to.” To address this, Latvia is establishing a drone test range in Riga, aiming to enable Ukrainian officers to test equipment in conditions that closely mimic real-life scenarios.

The newly opened drone competency center in Latvia aims to develop and integrate drone technologies within the Latvian National Armed Forces. This initiative will ensure a continuous supply of drone systems and components, which is critical during crises. The center will support the development of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and counter-drone capabilities, reinforcing Latvia’s commitment to enhancing its military technology.

Norway is also making strides in drone innovation, with Maj. Gen. Lars Lervik, chief of the Norwegian Army, revealing plans for a dedicated drone program. He announced an investment of 1.5 billion Norwegian Krone (approximately $1.49 million) over the next decade to enhance coordination and effectiveness in drone operations. “The overall idea is not just to get better value for money related to new acquisitions, but to also coordinate overall efforts to ensure that there is actually drone innovation happening in all parts of the army,” Lervik stated.

The Norwegian Army is currently testing various drone types, including those designed for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Lervik expressed ambition for integrating these systems into coordinated drone swarms, emphasizing the need for practical solutions rather than tailored national requirements. “If it’s good enough for the three other Nordic members, it’s good enough for me,” he concluded.

The increasing focus on uncrewed systems comes in the wake of Russian drone incursions across Europe, which have prompted NATO to bolster its presence on the Eastern Flank. The European Union is also exploring the development of a multi-layered air defense network to counter aerial threats, indicating a proactive approach to addressing modern warfare challenges.

In terms of long-range precision fires acquisition, Lervik noted delays in selecting a preferred contractor for Norway’s initiative, which initially aimed for a decision this past summer. He attributed the holdup to various factors, including the need for information from potential vendors. “The hope is to conclude the process of comparing alternatives and give a recommendation to government by Christmas,” he shared.

Competing for the contract are leading systems like Lockheed Martin’s M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) and South Korea’s Hanwha Aerospace K239 Chunmoo Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). Additionally, Norway is considering the purchase of up to 80 BAE Systems CV90 infantry fighting vehicles, which are part of a broader collaborative procurement effort involving Estonia, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, and Sweden.

As European nations continue to adapt their military strategies in response to evolving threats, the emphasis on proven technologies will likely shape the future of defense procurement across the region.