Ex-GOP Analyst Slams Rep. Nancy Mace Over Gay Marriage Flip-Flop

Former GOP analyst Tim Miller has launched a scathing critique of Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who faced backlash for her recent remarks on gay marriage. In a surprising social media post on Tuesday, Mace invoked the phrase “Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve,” a slogan often used by the religious right to belittle LGBTQ rights. This statement sparked significant controversy, prompting Miller to respond during a live recording of his podcast, “Bulwark Takes,” on Wednesday.

Miller, who previously worked for the Republican Party, shared a montage of Mace’s contradictory statements regarding LGBTQ rights. He emphasized that Mace has voted in favor of protecting gay marriage, pointing to evidence gathered from her past social media activity. “This is a deeply sad woman just looking for attention,” Miller stated, highlighting the inconsistency in her views.

Earlier today, Mace’s tweet received a Community Note on X, revealing her history of supporting LGBTQ rights, including a post from 2021 that proclaimed, “I support LGBTQ rights. Nobody should be discriminated against.” Mace’s evolving stance on marriage equality raises questions about her authenticity, especially since she previously stated, “Religious liberty, gay rights, and transgender equality can all coexist.”

Miller further illustrated Mace’s shifting tone, noting that her remarks about marriage began to change following her personal experiences with divorce. “That’s Nancy’s trajectory from ‘Equality for everybody’ to ‘Go ahead and get married if you want, gays, it’s miserable,’” he remarked. This shift in perspective has led many to question her commitment to LGBTQ rights.

The heated exchange has ignited discussions across social media, with many users calling out Mace for her apparent flip-flopping. As the political landscape continues to evolve, Mace’s credibility and alignment with her constituents are under scrutiny.

Next steps: Political analysts will be watching closely as Mace navigates the fallout from this incident. The implications for her support among both constituents and fellow Republicans could be significant, especially in light of the upcoming elections.

As this story develops, it underscores the ongoing conflict within the Republican Party regarding LGBTQ rights, illustrating the challenges faced by politicians who shift their stances in response to public sentiment. Stay tuned for further updates on this unfolding situation.